Total marks possible: 10 points.
| Criteria | Meets/Exceeds Expectations |
Below Expectations |
No Submission |
|---|---|---|---|
| Content Does the overview clearly demonstrate the project specific goals and where the team is currently at? |
[3 pts] A clear and concise description of the specific choices for the team's project. The test report shows the status of the implementation. A clear explanation of the teamwork strategy used so far, possibly how they resolved past problems that came up. Identification of potential obstacles in the upcoming milestones. | [1 pt] The required topics were touched on but the explanations were not always clear or some information is missing. | [0 pt] Not provided, or a lot of information is missing. |
| Participation Did everyone take part in the presentation? |
[1 pt] Everyone took part, and their parts were roughly evenly distributed. | [0 pt] Everyone took part but mostly one person said everything. Or not everyone took part. | [0 pt] A presentation was not given as scheduled. |
| Live Demo Was a successful live demo delivered? |
[3 pts] The live demo was smooth and showed clearly the current state of the prototype. All the implementation was working as expected. | [1 pt] A demo was given but it was not live. The demo had issues that made the presentation unclear or wasted a lot of time due to setup or things not working. Could not finish showing all the prototype. | [0 pt] Not provided, or a lot of information is missing. |
| Q&A Was the team able to answer questions reasonably well? |
[1 pt] Questions were answered honestly and intelligently. | [0 pt] Members were not able to answer the questions posed, or the answers seemed inconsistent with what was presented. | [0 pt] The presentation ran overtime and we could not have a Q&A portion for this presentation. |
| Team Evaluations Did the student complete the required number of evaluations for other teams? |
[2 pts] All the required number of evaluations were submitted on time. The feedback shows curiosity or provides constructive feedback. | [1 pt] Half or more of the required number of evaluations were submitted on time. | Some of the feedback was relevant.[0 pt] Fewer than half of the required number of evaluations were submitted on time. | The feedback is superficial, inconsistent, or rude. Alternatively, the evaluations were missing altogether.